# Customize · subagentlegal

> Build a Claude Code agent definition. Tabs: solo agent, team, enterprise presets, research experiments. Every page ships a recorded replay demo (animated for humans, this markdown for agents).

Canonical URL: https://www.subagentlegal.com/customize
Last verified: 2026-05-19

## What this page does

- Picks tools (`Read`, `Write`, `Edit`, `Bash`, `WebFetch`, etc.) from `lib/agent-config.ts`
- Selects a model (`claude-opus`, `claude-sonnet`, `claude-haiku`)
- Selects a permission mode (default, acceptEdits, bypassPermissions, plan)
- Generates a real `.claude/agents/<name>.md` file with YAML frontmatter

## Replay demos available on this page

### Diligence-grid

> _Legal-risk triage for a B2B SaaS acquisition_

**Model:** `claude-haiku-4-5`  
**Cassette:** `cassettes/legal/diligence-grid.har.json`  
**Replay URL:** [https://www.subagentlegal.com/api/v1/replay/legal/diligence-grid](https://www.subagentlegal.com/api/v1/replay/legal/diligence-grid)  
**Tokens spent on replay:** 0

**Stream live**

```bash
curl https://www.subagentlegal.com/api/v1/replay/legal/diligence-grid
```

**Prompt**

```
Summarize three legal risks for a B2B SaaS acquisition: data privacy, IP assignment, open-source license obligations.
```

**Response (replayed verbatim from the cassette)**

```
1. Data privacy: the target processes EU-resident PII without a documented Article 28 processor agreement, exposing the acquirer to GDPR successor liability.
2. IP assignment: three current contractors lack signed IP assignment clauses, leaving the ownership chain on two core libraries unverifiable at closing.
3. Open-source license obligations: the platform statically links to GPL-3 components without commensurate source-disclosure controls, creating a potential copyleft contamination claim.
```

### Contract-redline

> _Flag 3 material issues in an MSA clause + propose redlines_

**Model:** `claude-haiku-4-5`  
**Cassette:** `cassettes/legal/contract-redline.har.json`  
**Replay URL:** [https://www.subagentlegal.com/api/v1/replay/legal/contract-redline](https://www.subagentlegal.com/api/v1/replay/legal/contract-redline)  
**Tokens spent on replay:** 0

**Stream live**

```bash
curl https://www.subagentlegal.com/api/v1/replay/legal/contract-redline
```

**Prompt**

```
Flag the three most material issues in this MSA excerpt — perpetual feedback license, no IP indemnification, asymmetric termination-for-convenience — and redline each.
```

**Response (replayed verbatim from the cassette)**

```
1. Perpetual feedback license. Issue: perpetual + irrevocable + royalty-free lets Vendor monetize Customer-derived improvements indefinitely. Redline: "feedback usable only to improve the Service during the Term; no rights in Customer Confidential Information."

2. No IP indemnification. Issue: leaves Customer exposed to third-party IP claims. Redline: "Vendor shall defend and indemnify Customer against U.S. patent/copyright/trade-secret claims, subject to standard exceptions."

3. Asymmetric termination-for-convenience. Issue: Customer pays the full Term even when terminating — that's termination only for Vendor. Redline: "Customer-side TFC pays through effective date only; Vendor-side TFC requires 180 days' notice + pro-rated refund."
```

## Related markdown surfaces

- [/customize/team.md](/customize/team.md)
- [/customize/enterprise.md](/customize/enterprise.md)
- [/customize/experiments.md](/customize/experiments.md)
- [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)